<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Adamant1988 - Latest Comments</title><link>http://adamant1988.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://adamant1988.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:36:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Back to the bitchmeme.</title><link>http://adamant1988.com/?p=13#comment-335623</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mackenzie, you're right, and it's wrong and immoral to do THAT.  Frankly, that's not even possible to stop on the web, though.  I'll never forget talking to an artist who had recently had his work flat-out-stolen (read: someone else claimed they did it) by another 'artist'.  I sent him a fairly formal notice about the 'rip' and his response amazed me:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"I have my work reclaimed hundreds of times each and every day, it's just not worth my time to try to stop it"  These blatant violations of copyright law only come to the surface because we get angry and do knee-jerk things like file C&amp;amp;D complaints.  Better to focus attention on creating than it is to focus on the people who aren't.  If they get big enough on your content, they'll get caught, and their brand/reputation will be flat out destroyed by that.  If they don't get big enough to get caught.. then does it matter?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Posey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:36:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the bitchmeme.</title><link>http://adamant1988.com/?p=13#comment-335587</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, when I've complained about my content being taken, neither my name nor a link to my blog was attached.  That's flat out plagiarism.  One time they relicensed it.  That wasn't cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maco</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:26:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early Adopter Syndrome and the attention trap.</title><link>http://adamant1988.com/?p=11#comment-332687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As Jdong says "Tools can't replace self control and willpower"  ADHD-I is Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder - Inattentive Type. More commonly known as 'the day dreaming' type. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Posey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:02:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early Adopter Syndrome and the attention trap.</title><link>http://adamant1988.com/?p=11#comment-332620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's ADHD-I?  I didn't know there were multiple versions...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Between Pidgin, irssi, Twitux, Evolution, and 8 hours spent hacking at a small bug in Seahorse, I have gotten none of the PHP I'm supposed to write done.  I've just cleaned up my partner's code for our assignment.   Compiz's ADD Helper is no cure for a lack of priorities ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maco</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early Adopter Syndrome and the attention trap.</title><link>http://adamant1988.com/?p=11#comment-332607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mackenzie, I'm diagnosed as having Asperger  syndrome and ADHD-I.  Typical 'geek syndrome'.  I don't feel that I really said anything to disprove his hypothesis, since it may be very accurate.  I think, however, that it's the atmosphere of web 2.0 that has truly brought 'geek syndrome' and the unique characteristics of the early adopter demographic to the forefront.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rather, I'm suggesting that we've managed to create an entire economy that caters to our unique characteristics, and that's encouraged us to get to the point where many of us have well over 100 accounts on new web services. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Posey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:28:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early Adopter Syndrome and the attention trap.</title><link>http://adamant1988.com/?p=11#comment-332594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have ADHD and Hardy....does this support his hypothesis?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maco</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:22:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Testing post</title><link>http://adamant1988.com/?p=5#comment-331062</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Argh.  I be postin' a test comment on me blog. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Posey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:34:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>